Market Intelligence Brief: Selective Passage, Stabilising Oil, and the World Learning to Manage

March 17, 2026 - Iran has allowed ships from India, Pakistan, and Turkey to navigate the Strait; oil is showing signs of stabilising; and Far East markets rose in early European hours. The conflict has not ended, but the world is beginning to work around it. 

After the severity of Monday's opening, Tuesday brings a more measured picture. Far East markets rose during early European trading hours. US markets showed overnight recovery. Oil prices, which surged on Monday following the Strait's closure, are showing glimpses of stabilising. The catalyst for the shift is specific: Iran has allowed ships from India, Pakistan and Turkey to navigate the Strait of Hormuz. The selective passage does not reopen the Strait unconditionally, and oil remains stubbornly high. Still, the development signals something that markets have learned to recognise across every major geopolitical disruption: the world's capacity to adapt, navigate problems, and absorb shocks without a complete systemic breakdown. That adaptive process is now beginning to play out. 

 

Selective Passage and What It Signals 

Iran's decision to allow ships from India, Pakistan and Turkey through the Strait is not a reopening. It is a selective relaxation that carries both practical and political dimensions. In practice, it reduces the immediate pressure on supply chains to the ports and import networks of those three nations, which are significant in the context of regional energy and goods flows. The reduction in pressure on oil prices, partial though it is, reflects the market's calculation that selective passage narrows the worst-case supply disruption scenario even if it does not eliminate it. 

Politically, the selection of India, Pakistan and Turkey is itself analytically interesting. All three are significant regional powers with complex relationships with both the Western coalition and Iran. None of the three is party to the US-Israeli military operation. Granting them passage whilst maintaining the closure to vessels associated with the coalition and its direct allies is a calibrated move: Iran signals that it is not conducting an indiscriminate blockade, preserves some diplomatic goodwill with key regional actors, and retains the ability to escalate or de-escalate the closure depending on how the broader situation develops. 

For markets, the key read is that Iran retains both the capability and the intention to use the Strait selectively as a lever. That is a more nuanced picture than either full closure or full reopening, and the oil price's stubbornly elevated level reflects the ongoing uncertainty. The world is beginning to manage the disruption, but it has not resolved it. 

Oil: Stubbornly High, but Showing Signs of Stabilisation 

Oil remaining stubbornly high despite the partial easing is a reminder that the conflict's energy premium was never built solely on the probability of total Strait closure. Even with a selective passage reducing the most acute supply shock scenario, the underlying drivers of the premium remain: a military conflict directly involving major oil-producing and transit geography, an uncertain timeline to resolution, active diplomacy that has not yet produced results, and an oil market that is now pricing a sustained period of elevated geopolitical risk rather than a brief spike and recovery. 

The glimpses of stabilisation are nonetheless meaningful. A commodity market that is no longer accelerating in one direction is doing the work of finding a level that reflects the current state of actual and anticipated supply rather than the maximum fear premium of the previous session. Where that level settles will depend on how the selective passage develops over the coming days, whether it widens to other nations or narrows back to closure, and how the broader diplomatic picture evolves. 

The IEA's 400 million barrel strategic reserve release remains in the background as a policy buffer. Combined with the selective Strait passage, the energy market has two partial stabilisers operating simultaneously. Neither is sufficient to restore pre-conflict pricing, but together they provide enough of a counterweight to prevent the kind of continued oil-price escalation that Monday's opening threatened. 

 

US Futures: A Tight Range and a Market That Wants to Rise 

US futures are modestly lower this morning: the Dow is down 0.24%, the Nasdaq 100 is off 0.41%, and the S&P 500 is lower by 0.32%. The declines are contained and should be read in the context of Monday's partial recovery overnight rather than as a resumption of the sharper selling that preceded it. 

The S&P 500's current position is one that the chart describes with precision: a tight range, sitting between the floor established by recent geopolitical selling and the ceiling imposed by the same geopolitical uncertainty that prevents any genuine recovery. The index appears to want to climb. The AI infrastructure story, the corporate earnings backdrop, and the economic fundamentals that drove the remarkable upward trajectory of the past year have not disappeared. What has changed is the overlay of geopolitical uncertainty, inflationary pressures, and rate-hike risk that the conflict has placed on top of those fundamentals. 

The tension between underlying bullish momentum and geopolitical fear is visible in the tight range itself. When markets are genuinely uncertain about direction, they compress into ranges as buyers and sellers reach a temporary equilibrium. The range is neither comfortable nor stable; it is the price of two forces pulling in opposite directions, neither winning. Resolution of the geopolitical situation, or a clear enough signal of its trajectory, is what will ultimately break the stalemate. Until then, the S&P 500 trades within a tight range. 

 

European Equities: Resistance to Falling and the Underlying Upward Bias 

The FTSE UK 100 is up 0.28% this morning, continuing to demonstrate what its chart describes as a resistance to falling back. The observation is well-grounded: the FTSE has consistently found support at its longer-term upward channel's lower boundary through the conflict's most intense sessions. The energy sector's partial natural hedge, the index's international composition, and the underlying constructive pattern of higher lows have collectively provided structural support even as the geopolitical backdrop generated pressure. 

The qualification is important. Despite the conflict appearing to settle into a pattern, the room for further turmoil remains real. A conflict that has demonstrated the capacity to surprise with its speed of escalation, a Strait that is open only selectively rather than fully, and a diplomatic process that is still in its early stages collectively ensure that the FTSE's resistance to falling is a function of structural support rather than any absence of risk. 

Germany 40 is fractionally lower at minus 0.07%, essentially flat in a session where the direction of travel is genuinely uncertain. The DAX's position near its support levels, which came under severe pressure earlier in the week, suggests the market is holding its ground rather than actively recovering. The Strait passage is a modestly positive development for the German industrial outlook, reducing the most severe energy supply disruption scenarios by a margin. 

 

Foreign Exchange: Marginal Dollar Retreat, Upward Trajectory Intact 

Currency markets are reflecting a modestly improved risk sentiment, with marginal moves across all major pairs. EURUSD is fractionally higher at plus 0.09%, GBPUSD is up 0.07%, and USDJPY is marginally firmer at plus 0.02%. None of the moves carries directional conviction; they are the currency market's quiet acknowledgement that Tuesday's backdrop is less acute than Monday's. 

USDJPY's upward trajectory remains intact despite Tuesday's minimal change. The attribution of the pair's persistent strength to dollar factors rather than yen weakness is a meaningful analytical distinction. Dollar strength, rooted in safe-haven demand and rate-hike expectations, is a function of the current geopolitical cycle. When that cycle concludes, and the safe-haven premium recedes, the dollar's structural support at current levels becomes less certain. Yen weakness rooted in Japan's monetary policy framework is a more durable force. Understanding which driver is dominant at any given point matters for assessing how the pair behaves as the conflict eventually winds down. 

For EURUSD and GBPUSD, the marginal firming reflects the partial easing of oil pressure from the Strait passage, reducing the most acute inflationary scenario for European economies and the associated rate-hike urgency. The moves are too small to represent a genuine euro or sterling recovery, but they are consistent with a session where the pressure is marginally less severe than the previous day. 

 

A World That Learns to Manage 

The observation that the world is starting to manage the disruption is one of the most important analytical frames for understanding where markets are headed from here. Every significant geopolitical shock in modern financial history has eventually been managed, worked around, or resolved. Oil crises of previous decades led to adaptation in the energy mix and energy efficiency. Prior Strait tensions produced alternative routing and reserve deployment. Financial crises produced policy responses that, however imperfect, prevented complete systemic breakdown. 

The current situation is following a recognisable pattern. The initial shock phase produced extraordinary volatility and maximum uncertainty. The risk pricing phase embedded a substantial premium across oil, currencies, and equity risk. The adaptation phase is now beginning: selective passage reduces the most severe scenario, strategic reserves provide a partial buffer, and the IEA's coordinated response demonstrates institutional readiness to deploy policy tools. 

None of this means the conflict is approaching its end. The military operation continues, the diplomatic situation involving NATO and China is unresolved, Iran retains its capacity to alter the Strait's status, and the Supreme Leader's condition and the chain of command in Tehran remain uncertain. What is changing is the global economy's posture toward the disruption: from acute shock to managed uncertainty, which creates a different, more sustainable operating environment for markets, even if it is a long way from the pre-conflict baseline. 

 

The Bottom Line 

Tuesday brings a more measured session than Monday's Strait closure and oil surge produced. Far East markets rose overnight. US markets showed recovery. Iran's selective passage for India, Pakistan and Turkey is providing a partial easing of oil pressure, and the commodity is showing glimpses of stabilisation rather than continued escalation. 

US futures are modestly softer, consistent with the tight range in which the S&P 500 is operating rather than any renewed directional selling. The index appears to want to climb but remains constrained by geopolitical uncertainty. European equities are mixed: the FTSE is resisting the pull lower and finding support within its upward channel, the DAX is essentially flat. 

Currency markets are marginally calmer. USDJPY's upward trajectory continues to reflect dollar strength rather than yen weakness, a distinction that will matter as the conflict eventually resolves. EURUSD and GBPUSD are fractionally firmer on the partial oil easing. 

No major earnings are scheduled today. The session's direction will be determined by how the Strait passage develops, whether oil finds a more stable floor, and whether any further diplomatic signals emerge from the ongoing NATO and China discussions. The world is beginning to manage. That is not the same as resolved, but it is meaningfully different from the acute crisis mode of last week's closing sessions. 

 

Lunaro Financial Services Limited (trading as ‘Lunaro’) is an execution-only service provider. This material is a marketing communication and is provided for general information and educational purposes only. It does not take into account your personal circumstances, objectives or needs. Any opinions are those of the author at the time of writing and may change without notice. Nothing in this material constitutes (or should be construed as) financial, investment, legal, regulatory or tax advice, or a recommendation to engage in any investment activity. You should not rely on this material when making investment or trading decisions. 

This material has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research. Lunaro may deal as principal and/or have an interest in the financial instruments or markets referred to in this material in the ordinary course of its business, including at or around the time of publication, and does not seek to take advantage of this material prior to its dissemination. 

While reasonable care has been taken in preparing this material, no representation or warranty is made as to its accuracy or completeness and Lunaro accepts no liability for any loss arising from any use of, or reliance on, this material. 

Approximately 80% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money